Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNATESYA, VIRDA
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-06T02:52:56Z
dc.date.available2022-08-06T02:52:56Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-06
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.uhn.ac.id/handle/123456789/7108
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to learn more about public hate speech that is often used by people. So that a problem was raised, namely identifying the types of impoliteness, the types most often used, and how they were realized in the comments made to Yusuf Mansur on youtube broadcasts. This study uses Culpeper's theory using qualitative methods. After conducting the research, it was found that Negative Impoliteness was the most dominant with data of 52 (52%), Sercasm/Mock Politeness with data of 17 (17%), Positive Impoliteness with data of 16 (16%). Bald on Record Impoliteness with 15 (15%). The comments in this study tend to give the listeners Negative Impoliteness and don't think about the impact received by the listeners because this type of impoliteness is a word that is used to show an expression of displeasure and emotions usually in the form of ridicule and ridicule.en_US
dc.subjectImpoliteness,en_US
dc.subjectNetizen,en_US
dc.subjectComments,en_US
dc.subjectInvestment Scam,en_US
dc.subjectYouTubeen_US
dc.titleIMPOLITENESS AS FOUND ON YOUTUBE COMMENTS TOWARDS YUSUF MANSUR ABOUT INVESTMENT SCAMen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record