Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSinaga, Budiman
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-02T15:38:50Z
dc.date.available2019-06-02T15:38:50Z
dc.date.issued2016-06
dc.identifier.issn2548-5989
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.uhn.ac.id/handle/123456789/2227
dc.description.abstractPowers of the Constitutional Court have been regulated in the Constitution. In the Constitution of the powers of the Constitutional Court has been clearly regulated. Then came the effort to increase the powers of the Constitutional Court through various Law and the decision of the Constitutional Court itself. The extra power of the Constitutional Court has turned out to cause various problems, including corruption. Constitution, in essence, provides power restrictions. Powers of state institutions stipulated in the Constitution means that power is limited. Extra power through the Constitutional Court Act has turned out to cause problems. Therefore, the power of the Constitutional Court must be returned to the authority contained in the Constitution alone. Thus the addition of powers of the Constitutional Court through a change in the Constitution is not necessary.en_US
dc.language.isootheren_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Pelita Harapan Medanen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol. I, No. 2 – Juni 2016;
dc.subjectAuthority, Constitution, Constitualism, Constitutional Court, Restrictionen_US
dc.titlePEMBATASAN KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI MELALUI UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR TAHUN 1945en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record