| dc.contributor.author | Esther, July | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-15T09:23:10Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-11-15T09:23:10Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015-12-12 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2289-1552 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.uhn.ac.id/handle/123456789/1645 | |
| dc.description | Based on the discussion above may results the conclusions as follows:
a. Systems of criminal accountability for the Province/City/Regency as a public legal entity in the formulation of the Law
International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, Vol. 8, Issue 4 (Dec.)
ISSN 2289-1552 2015
61
Corruption Eradication embrace accountability identification teachings (doctrine of identification) and aggregation teachings
(doctrine of aggregation). Directing mens rea element of mind, in this case the governor/mayor/regent, should be proven to
have committed an act against the law according to the criminal acts of corruption formulations Law Corruption Eradication.
Governor/mayor/regent as head of the district will be charged as criminal accountability of departmental responsibility
(liability department).
b. The Province/City/Regency that has been sentenced as a public legal entity is a criminal offense with the maximum criminal
fine plus 1/3 (one third) and accompanied by additional criminal. This is different to punished Governor/mayor/regent in the
form of imprisonment and criminal fines, but also charged the return loss of financial or national economy. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The subject of law in corruption criminal action is not only personal but also corporation. Corporation is not far from the system
of criminal responsibility. This paper aims to find out the system of responsibility and punishment for the province/city/regency
that made the decree and had inflicted the financial of country. The system of criminal responsibility for the corporation in
several conducted rules consists of strict liability that burdened the criminal responsibility without see the fault and vicarious
liability to others except the doer. Corporation, as the group of people or assets that organized well with law or not has
responsibility and in corruption criminal action based on the chapter 20 Law Number 31 Year 1999 Juncto Law Number 20 Year
2001 on the Eradication of Corruption. This chapter is conducted by or represents the corporation. It has members to run the
company can’t be freed from the punishment although the prison punishment can’t be done to the corporation. The system of
responsibility of the governor/mayor/regent is related to the decree, in this case it is about the committee of means and
infrastructure provision that has been conducted and inflicted the financial or economic of country. It can’t be separated from
the responsibility of the province/city/regent as the corporation, must get punishment based on the chapter 20 on the Eradication
of Corruption with the personal responsibility of the governor/mayor/regent and the committee that had been appointed. The
punishment for the governor/mayor/regent is the punishing from the corruption doer because he is as the leader chosen by the
society. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | http://ijbel.com/previous-issues/december-2015/vol-8-december-2015-issue-4-law/ | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | International Journal of Business, Economics and Law;Vol. 8, Issue 4 (December 2015) | |
| dc.subject | Responsibility, Corruption Criminal Action, Province/city/regent | en_US |
| dc.title | THE SYSTEM OF RESPONSIBILITY AND PUNISHMENT FOR THE PROVINCE/CITY/ REGENCY AND GOVERNOR/MAYOR/REGENT IN CORRUPTION CRIMINAL ACTION | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
