| dc.description.abstract | This thesis focus on finding out the comparative focus on looking for significanr
diffrencess teaching between Face to Face Learning and Google Classroom Aplication for students understanding in reading procedure text. The writer want to find the diffrent result test of students about procedure text by Face to Face Learning and Google Classroom Aplication. The writer focus to language features in procedure text such as: Imperative, Simple Present Tense, Action Verb, Connective of Squence and Numbering. The writer took 20 students as experimental group. The data were taken by giving multiple choices question. The test was used the pre-test and post-test. The mean score of pre-test by Face to Face Learning is 34 and pre-test by Google Classroom Aplication is 32. The mean score post-test by Face to Face Learning is 76 and post-test by Google Classroom Aplication is 51. Based the mean score above, the mean score by Face to Face Learning is higher than by Google Classroom Aplication. the result of t-test, that t-observed > t-table as the level significance p = 0.05 (3,45 > 1,685) with degree of freedom = 20 + 20 – 2 = 38. It means Face to Face Learning is more effective in increasing students understanding in reading procedure text than Google Classroom Aplication. | en_US |
